A TECHNO-ECONOMIC NEWS MAGAZINE FOR MEDICAL PLASTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Our 26th Year of Publication
Page  6 of 17

Cover Story

Building Manufacturing Capabilities for Medical Devices in a Developing Country – India, a case study

 

 

 

 
 

Dr. Jitendera Sharma
Mg. Director, AMTZ

Mr. Rajiv Nath
Forum Coordinator, AiMeD
 

.

1. Preamble and Background :

 

1.1 Government of most developing countries has laid emphasis on provision of good quality, affordable and comprehensive healthcare to all its citizens. While Healthcare infrastructure & Human Resources are areas in which most countries have achieved self-sufficiency, Medical Devices has usually remained a laggard sector where focused action is very much required.

 

1.2 Medical Device Industry (MDI) is a multi-product diversified engineering industry from simple tongue depressors & glucometer strips to large radiology & electronic modules. Global market for medical devices is over US$ 220 billion in India it is relatively small compared to rest of the manufacturing sector; guesstimates would place the Retail Sales at over US $ 10 billion estimate, growing steadily at a rate of 17% CGAR. Within MDI, the broad product classifications that exist are:

 

I) Disposables & Consumables;

 

ii) Surgical Instruments & Implants;

 

iii) Equipment & Electronics & iv) Diagnostic Reagents. Domestic manufacturing is concentrated around low cost devices such as Intra-ocular lenses, catheters and syringes; as well as production of implants. Some growth spikes have also been achieved in manufacturing of radiology and ultrasound products, cath labs and linear accelerator.

 

1.3 It is estimated that there are about 800 manufactures in the country with average turnover of US$ 7 million & average export turnover of $ 2.5 million

 

1.4 While MDI in India faces a classical set of challenges, primary among them being lack of motivation to manufacture many medical devices with unviable margins due to ease of low cost imports (including pre-owned equipment) coupled with absence of robust regulatory framework for medical devices, avenues for pooling and bridging of adequate fresh talent into the sector, lack of pathways for uptake of innovations in supply chain; lack of subsidies and incentives appropriate to the levels of providing a bolus to the industry, Steps have been taken on some of these, such as - Medical Devices Rules 2017; classification of occupational standards under Health Sector Skill Council; Competency mapping of biomedical engineers under IBSC (Indian Biomedical Skill Consortium) incentives for export promotion by Department of Commerce; Preferential Procurement Order guidelines for procurement by public healthcare under GOI , initiation of AMTZ medical devices park in Andhra Pradesh and another one by Telangana; establishment of Kalam Institute of Healthcare Technology to accelerate indigenously developed technologies and Government’s decision to have more IITs for speeding research. Some of the areas however are still unattended to, and require more concentrated and comprehensive approach. While many of these steps have been comprehensive efforts from Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; Ministry of Commerce & Industry; Dept. of Pharmaceuticals, Niti Aayog and Ministry of Electronics a need for central information pooling and coordination mechanism has been felt by the Government.

 

1.5 A GOI (Govt. of India) constituted Task Force in its report on 8th of April 2015 elucidated a set of recommendations for boosting growth of MDI in India.

 

2. Salient Features & recommendation :

 

(I) Coordinating & Facilitating Agency: The policy envisages setting up of an autonomous facilitation body “National Medical Device Promotion Council) to be created under the Department of Pharmaceuticals to provide necessary facilitation and coordination, to various departments and ministries. Additionally, Industry recommended that the Department of Pharmaceuticals needs to be renamed as Department of Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices and in future could be housed in a Ministry of Healthcare Products. The NMDPC would need to be staffed with a mix of personnel from Bio Medical engineering, Product Development, Medical and Marketing backgrounds with needed expertise for enabling interdepartmental coordination.

 

(ii) Infrastructure creation: The policy recommends setting up of Medical Technology Industrial Parks and medical devices testing laboratories under PPP mode as revenue generating self-sustaining business models while providing for low cost/subsidized testing facility for the industry and setting up of Common Incubation Centers (CICs) with appropriate incentive structure and cost sharing mechanisms and establishing technical and financial frameworks for their function. The industry recommends development of common technology clusters, sharing common manufacturing facilities, ancillaries, common testing facilities and a CAPEX sharing model with a revenue supporting stream.

 

(iii) Intellectual Property & Skill building: the policy envisages:

 

a. With support of Indian Patent Office, for transfer/operationalization of Intellectual Property for facilitating voluntary technology uptake and upgradations, through established commercial models.

 

b. Enabling protective measures to protect outright purchase of patents from research institutions and startups based within India.

 

c. For assisting product development and to aid demonstration of Regulatory compliances, there is a need for capability development in testing of medical devices. The existing laboratories need to be up gradated and accredited and provide access to low cost access to testing and impediments for doing research on IVD and with tested blood samples need to be addressed. Laboratories in certain Universities with bio technology courses can be encouraged to provide antigens and antibodies and sero conversion panels to IVD industry which currently depends totally on imports.

 

d. Working with stakeholders such as National Skill Development Agency (NSDA) for promotion of occupational and vocational standards for training of engineering workforce for medical devices industry.

 

3. Policy support sought by industry :

 

a. Government being the biggest buyer can accelerate domestic manufacturing with a Preferential Purchase Policy with Preferential Pricing (as per World Bank Terms) for Indian Medical Devices for Public Healthcare Tenders and consider the need to encourage quality and safety provide weight age for ICMED (Indian QA Certification for medical devices) and ISO 13485 QMS Certification and similarly for Design India Certification for promoting indigenous development. The Public healthcare system needs to move from Lowest Price basis to UN system of Sustainable supply chain basis and penalize suppliers with a poor track record of service and delivery and reward those with proven services as well provide opportunity to new entrants and startups.

 

b. Promoting activities supporting technology transfers increase in market access and those supporting commercialization of innovations;

 

c. Studying international best practices and recommending evidence based industry promotion strategies including manufacturing incentives such as interest subsidies, concessional power tariffs, provision of seed capital and/or viability gap funding;

 

d. Providing tax liberalization measures including but not limited to – higher weighted tax deduction on approved expenditure on R & D to cater to high gestation period; extension of R&D tax benefits to Limited Liability Partnerships; tax and regulatory barriers on import of preowned medical devices, wherever found necessary / applicable; incentivizing export of medical devices; and formulating guidelines for mergers and acquisition in medical device sector to protect the interest of medical devices industry.

 

e. A planned predictable tariff policy to enable business viability and to make investment in this sector attractive and provide nominal protection in a phased manner. Basic Import Tariff needs to be increased from 0-7.5% to 15% for Medical Devices and duty on components to be 7.5% as a Make in India enabler. Concessional duty on medical grade Raw Materials may be retained at 2.5% for now, for next few Years.

 

f. Supportive Clinical environment: Policy to encourage government hospitals & medical colleges that would partner with domestic manufacturers in clinical evaluation as per regulatory requirements and HTA (Health technology assessment) studies with reasonable charges and publication of studies of clinical outcomes.

 

4. Regulations to ensure Patient Safety :

 

A Policy to ensure patient safety and build competence and competitiveness is needed whereby Government should incentivize voluntary Indian Certification for Medical Devices by QCI (Quality Council of India) and expedite legislation for Regulation of all Medical Devices outside the ambit of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act at one go with a defined transition period for enabling capacity building for the manufacturers and Regulatory Framework.

 

Conclusion: A National Medical Device Policy framework needs to achieve time bound growth of medical devices industry by supporting measures to promote manufacturing as part of Make in India and enabling improved affordable access to medical devices for general public with the objective of inclusive Growth..

Back | Back to Top | Previous |Next