Medical Plastic Data Service Magazine

 

A TECHNO-ECONOMIC NEWS MAGAZINE FOR MEDICAL PLASTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

Our 31st Year of Publication
Page  2 of 4
 

Manufacturing

Medical Device Translation And Compliance

 

Dr. Manoj Komath
Scientist G, Biomedical Technology Wing,
Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology,
Trivandrum – 695012. E-mail : manoj@sctimst.ac.in

The advancement of science and technology caused a phenomenal impact on healthcare in the previous decades. The major share of this impact happened through the dissemination of medical devices. Biomedical research has led to the realisation of a huge number of implantable devices which append or substitute the functions of natural organs. By the definition of WHO, a medical device can be any instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, appliance, implant, reagent for in vitro use, software, material, or other similar or related article, intended by the manufacturer to be used, alone or in combination for a medical purpose.

As of today, there are an estimated 2 million different kinds of medical devices on the world market, categorized into more than 7000 generic device groups. The market size in this area in India is estimated to be USD 11 billion. Our country largely imports which comes to 80% of the domestic requirement. Research on medical devices and the translation of related products are promoted worldwide, because access to good quality, affordable, and appropriate health products is the key to healthier populations..

Development of Medical Devices

 

The design and development process of a medical device is basically a translation activity of converting the requirements of an unmet need into a physical product. To ensure consistent translation, a set of policies and practices could be adopted, known as the ‘medical device design controls’. Good design controls help to reduce product risks and to ensure the fitness of the product for the purpose. The standard ISO 13485 sets out a series of requirements for design controls to be adopted for medical devices. Figure 1 shows the various steps of the Design Control Process.

 

It starts from an ‘Unmet Need’ or the requirement put forward by the user (primarily a medical professional). The requirement may be for a totally new product or for a substitute of a product that is not available or affordable in a particular geographic region.

 

 

Figure 1 : The work flow of design development of a medical device.

 

In the second step, the ‘Design Input’ is formulated after carefully evaluating the needs of the customer. Thereafter, the logical, functional, and performance features of the product, along with other parameters, are defined. Subsequently, the essential features, design protocols, and methodologies are documented. This is not a single-time process but is iterative in nature.

 

The third step is the ‘Design Process’, which includes all the methods, techniques, and modalities that convert the design inputs into an acceptable and technologically viable output. It leads to the fourth step of establishing the ‘Design Output’ which compiles the functional specification, design plan, drawings, flow charts, service specification, etc.

 

The fifth step of making the Medical Device Prototype will be done after the ‘verification process’. It confirms whether the specifications are satisfying requirements or not. For this purpose, it should be ensured that the output should be - (i) a verifiable parameter, (ii) validated against the requirements, and (iii) in proper approval format. In case revisions are needed, the output will be fed as the input, and the process will go on until the Design Output is aligned with the Design Input.

 

Once the final design is ready, it is transmitted to the production facility for pilot production. The design control regulation mandates a ‘Design History File’ (DHF), which illustrates the entire product development process. It should be noted that the design control process doesn’t end with transferring the final design output to the pilot production phase. It is rather a holistic approach, incorporating the feedback from manufacturing processes, and it considers necessary changes from usage patterns as well as failed product analysis. Overall it ensures an appropriate product with the highest quality and gives scope for improvement in the product and the manufacturing process.

 

Concepts of Review, Verification, and Validation in the Device Development Process

 

In the medical device design controls, the appropriateness or completeness of each step is ensured through the ‘Review Process’. This activity will help to make sure that the design is on the right track. At each step, the review checkpoints are identified and the team can decide when and how the reviews could be conducted. The early detection of the errors in design review will help in fixing errors before it goes to the final product/service, wherein the corrections will be difficult and expensive. Therefore, procedures should be created to follow the review outputs closely for errors and corrections, and for implementing the corrections back in the design.

 

The ‘Verification Process’ evaluates whether a design output meets the requirements, specifications, or regulations defined in the design input. Or it answers the question “Did we do the right thing?”. The process essentially determines whether the design and the specifications will result in the desired product or not. In order to establish this, a thorough review of the design should be done at the design output stage for all the activities or features. The team has to verify the correctness of the design features against original requirements, record the review findings, and take necessary corrective actions. It is important to document any design change proposed so that it is appropriately carried out without fail.

 

The ‘Validation process’ evaluates if the product delivers benefits, according to the needs of targeted users or not. Or it deals with the question “Did we do it right?”. The process practically examines the product as to whether it does what it is supposed to do. Typically, this is done before the delivery or implementation of the product. The results of the activities should be documented so as to take necessary corrective actions in time.

Advertisers' Index

Accuprec Research Labs Pvt. Ltd., India
Ambica Medicare Engineering, India
Bry-Air Asia Pvt. Ltd., India
Nu-Vu Conair Pvt. Ltd., India
Celanese Corporation, India
CLS Pvt. Ltd., India
Carclo Technical Plastics Pvt. Ltd., India
ET Elastomer Technik, Germany
Eewa Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd., India
Elkem South Asia Pvt Ltd, India
I-Kare Polyalloys Pvt. Ltd., India
KLJ Group, India
Lubrizol Advanced Materials India Pvt. Ltd.
Map Industries, India
Milliken & Company, India
Milacron India Pvt. Ltd., India
GLR Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India
HighRichja Precision Extrusion Machinery Co. Ltd., China
PVC Colouring Compounding & Processing, India
Qosina, USA
R.R. Patel Gases (P) Ltd., India
Raumedic AG
SMC Medical Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd., India
Tekni-Plex India Pvt. Ltd., India
Trustin Analytical Solutions Private Limited, India
Yizumi India

Airways Surgical Pvt. Ltd., India

Alpha Medicare and Devices Ltd., India
Alpha Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd., India
Angiplast Pvt. Ltd., India
Beacon Plastics, India
Delux Surgical, Inida
International Certification Services Pvt. Ltd., India
Jain Rubbers Pvt. Ltd., India
Life-O-Line Technologist, India
Leelavathy Medical Device Company, India
SEC Global Consulting & Initiative LLP, India
Surgi Pack India Pvt. Ltd.
Amigo Surgi Care Pvt. Ltd., India
Apex Medical Devices, India
Jimit Medico Surgicals Pvt. Ltd.
Morrisons Lifecare Pvt. Ltd., India
National Healthcare, India
Pharmadocx, Inida
S. Nath & Co., India

Unikal Consultants, India

Back | Back to Top | Previous | Next