Medical Plastic Data Service Magazine

 

A TECHNO-ECONOMIC NEWS MAGAZINE FOR MEDICAL PLASTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY

Our 32nd Year of Publication
Page  5 of 5
 

Cover Story

Medical Device Ethylene Oxide (ETO/EO) Sterilization: Validation and other challenges

 

6 Process and equipment characterization

 

6.1 General

 

The purpose of this activity is to define the entire sterilization process and the equipment necessary to deliver the sterilization process safely and reproducibly.

 

6.2 Process characterization

 

Process characterization, at a minimum, shall include:

 

a) identifying the phases that are necessary for an EO sterilization process;
b) identifying the process variables for each phase; and
c) documenting the process variables

 

6.3 Equipment characterization

 

The specification for the equipment to be used shall be developed and documented. This specification shall include:

 

a) the preconditioning area (if used);
b) the sterilizer; and
c) the aeration area (if used)

 

9 Validation

 

9.1 General

 

The purpose of validation is to demonstrate that the sterilization process established in the process definition (see Clause 8) can be delivered effectively and reproducibly to the product within the sterilization load. Validation consists of several identified stages: installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ). Testing shall not commence until the procedures and/or protocols have been approved.

 

9.2 Installation qualification, IQ

9.3 Operational qualification, OQ

9.4 Performance qualification, PQ – Microbiological & Physical

9.5 Review and approval of validation

 

The purpose of this activity is to undertake and document a review of the validation data to confirm the acceptability against the approved validation procedures/protocol for the sterilization process and to approve the process specification.

 

10 Routine monitoring and control

 

The purpose of routine monitoring and control is to demonstrate that the validated and specified sterilization process has been delivered to the product.

 

When validating an EO sterilization process, it is necessary to perform a mapping of the chamber and monitor temperature and relative humidity to evaluate the performance of EO sterilization. Both empty and loaded chamber tests are required.

 

It is important that patient safety be addressed by minimizing exposure to EO and its by-products during normal product use. ISO 10993 7 specifies limits for EO and ethylene chlorohydrin (ECH); however, no exposure limits are set for ethylene glycol (EG) because risk assessment indicates that when EO residues are controlled, it is unlikely that biologically significant residues of EG would be present.

 

Author’s observations during validation / re-validation process – challenges:

 

# Use of wireless data loggers can make validation process more accurate and easier

 

# Use of EO concentration monitor probe is recommended. This is expensive but can be very reassuring for validation data.

 

# BI strips used per cycle is substantial in number and cost of testing post the cycle is substantial, especially when their results need to be validated from third party (independent test facility).

 

These and other time and cost consuming processes make the validation very assuring for manufacturer, healthcare person and of course the patient.

 

Acceptable and beyond Quality of device; assurance of its safe and effective use should be kept in mind while carrying out these validations faithfully and diligently.

 

Some extracts from FDA guidance documents:

 

How Does the FDA Help Ensure that Medical Devices Sterilized with Ethylene Oxide Are Safe?

 

Before most sterile medical devices are on the market, the FDA reviews premarket submissions to determine if the sterility information (for example, the method the manufacturer is choosing to sterilize their device and validation activities used to show that the device can be effectively sterilized) is in accordance with internationally agreed upon voluntary consensus standards that the FDA recognizes. An important element of our regulatory framework is a robust standards program. The FDA encourages medical device manufacturers to use FDA-recognized voluntary consensus standards in their submissions, as conformity to relevant standards streamlines regulatory review and fosters quality. Learn more about the FDA's Recognized Standards Program.

 

For ethylene oxide sterilization, voluntary consensus standards (ANSI AAMI ISO 11135:2014) describe how to develop, validate, and control ethylene oxide sterilization processes for medical devices and the acceptable levels of residual ethylene oxide and ethylene chlorohydrin left on a device after it has undergone ethylene oxide sterilization. These standards help ensure levels of ethylene oxide on medical devices are within safe limits since long-term and occupational exposure to ethylene oxide has been linked to cancer. Learn more about the risks of ethylene oxide on the National Institutes of Health web page on ethylene oxide. The FDA also inspects industrial facilities that sterilize medical
devices and medical device manufacturing facilities to make sure that they have validated sterilization processes that meet FDA -recognized standards.

 

EPA's Role in Ethylene Oxide Sterilization

 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reviews and enforces the Clean Air Act regulations for sterilization facilities that emit ethylene oxide to ensure that they protect the public from significant risk. Learn more about the EPA's Regulations for Ethylene Oxide on EPA's website.

 

Note: In preparation of this article author acknowledges he has referred and quoted from ISO 11135 narratives and FDA guidance documents. He is grateful to them.

Advertisers' Index

Accuprec Research Labs Pvt. Ltd., India
Ambica Medicare Engineering, India
Bry-Air Asia Pvt. Ltd., India
Nu-Vu Conair Pvt. Ltd., India
Celanese Corporation, India
CLS Pvt. Ltd., India
Carclo Technical Plastics Pvt. Ltd., India
ET Elastomer Technik, Germany
Eewa Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd., India
Elkem South Asia Pvt Ltd, India
I-Kare Polyalloys Pvt. Ltd., India
KLJ Group, India
Lubrizol Advanced Materials India Pvt. Ltd.
Map Industries, India
Milliken & Company, India
Milacron India Pvt. Ltd., India
GLR Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India
HighRichja Precision Extrusion Machinery Co. Ltd., China
PVC Colouring Compounding & Processing, India
Qosina, USA
R.R. Patel Gases (P) Ltd., India
Raumedic AG
SMC Medical Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd., India
Tekni-Plex India Pvt. Ltd., India
Trustin Analytical Solutions Private Limited, India
Yizumi India

Airways Surgical Pvt. Ltd., India

Alpha Medicare and Devices Ltd., India
Alpha Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd., India
Angiplast Pvt. Ltd., India
Beacon Plastics, India
Delux Surgical, Inida
International Certification Services Pvt. Ltd., India
Jain Rubbers Pvt. Ltd., India
Life-O-Line Technologist, India
Leelavathy Medical Device Company, India
SEC Global Consulting & Initiative LLP, India
Surgi Pack India Pvt. Ltd.
Amigo Surgi Care Pvt. Ltd., India
Apex Medical Devices, India
Jimit Medico Surgicals Pvt. Ltd.
Morrisons Lifecare Pvt. Ltd., India
National Healthcare, India
Pharmadocx, Inida
S. Nath & Co., India

Unikal Consultants, India

Back | Back to Top | Previous